Back to Archive
Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
Spanish, Castilian
Tareas de control cognitivo Simon Task: revisión crítica – Cognitive Control Tasks Simon Task: Critical Review
Tatiana Castañeda
Universidad San Buenaventura
Views
2,219
Downloads
2,407
Community Rating
Abstract
Cognitive control tasks allow the analysis of data provided by experimental
processing mechanisms, in which one must respond under conditions of
congruence-incongruence stimuli. The present critical review aims to analyze
the main studies of the Simon Task cognitive control task, with special attention
to the research method employed. The literature search was carried out using
the PubMed and MedLine databases. Five studies conducted between 2000
and 2020 were selected. There is a remarkable growth in experimental
research with the use of cognitive control tasks, especially classic tasks such
as the Stroop, the Go/No Go and Eriksen's Flanker, which due to their wide
description in the literature can help to strengthen discussions in researches
that want to measure this variable.
Rate this research
Help the community discover quality papers.
Thank you for your rating!
Discussion
Thank you for your comment!
We will review it carefully. Please understand that it may take a little longer before we can publish it.
There are no comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Article Information
Title
Tareas de control cognitivo Simon Task: revisión crítica – Cognitive Control Tasks Simon Task: Critical Review
Type
Article
Published in
Journal
25. April 2022
DOI Identifier
10.17160/josha.9.2.814
Language
Spanish, Castilian
Journal
Vol 9 Issue 2
Categories
Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, News and Views
Authors
Tatiana Castañeda1
Affiliations
1
Universidad San Buenaventura
This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cite this work
Tatiana Castañeda (2022). "Tareas de control cognitivo Simon Task: revisión crítica – Cognitive Control Tasks Simon Task: Critical Review". JOSHA Journal. DOI: 10.17160/josha.9.2.814.