Back to Archive
Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
Spanish, Castilian
Normative model of special relations. Moral justification of ancillary care obligations towards subjects participating in clinical research.
Yanina Fontana
FLACSO
Views
1,606
Downloads
2,556
Community Rating
Abstract
The objective of this thesis is to propose a new normative model of moral justification and to include it in the set of already existing normative models, which deliberate on whether or not there is an obligation of auxiliary attention of the researcher towards the individual participant of biomedical research. The term "ancillary care" refers to the health care that clinical research participants need, but that is not related to the safety or scientific validity of the research, nor is it related to the management ("redress") of harm caused to participants.
This model that I propose, and which I will call the "Special Relationship Model," focuses on certain special relationships of research participants, such as dependent family members and/or sexual partners, directly or indirectly linked to clinical research.
Rate this research
Help the community discover quality papers.
Thank you for your rating!
Discussion
Thank you for your comment!
We will review it carefully. Please understand that it may take a little longer before we can publish it.
There are no comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Article Information
Title
Normative model of special relations. Moral justification of ancillary care obligations towards subjects participating in clinical research.
Type
Article
Published in
Journal
17. June 2019
DOI Identifier
10.17160/josha.6.6.573
Language
Spanish, Castilian
Journal
Vol 6 Issue 6
Categories
Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
Authors
Yanina Fontana1
Affiliations
1
FLACSO
This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cite this work
Yanina Fontana (2019). "Normative model of special relations. Moral justification of ancillary care obligations towards subjects participating in clinical research.". JOSHA Journal. DOI: 10.17160/josha.6.6.573.