Uniting Fields of Knowledge: The Role of Interdisciplinary Journals in Science

As Frank (2024) praised in his speech Josha with its interdisciplinary, open access and editorial review system, takes up a very unique space in today's scientific landscape. This article examines the scientific journals which have had or have a similar editorial approach when it comes to the communication and production of science. The most important journals with a similar editorial guideline are Isis, Daedalus and Studium Generale. Despite originating in different historical contexts, all share a commitment to fostering dialogue between scientific fields. The article also explores shifts in the meaning of science and its production, in order to contextualize the appearance and importance of these journals. Ultimately, the study argues that interdisciplinary journals continue to arise in response to the evolving intellectual landscape, challenging academic structures and fostering holistic scientific discourse.